Technical Case Study: Modernizing IAM Infrastructure for a Global Defense and Coordination Network

A global organization tasked with coordinating multi-national operations across defense, humanitarian, and intelligence missions faced a critical challenge in modernizing its Identity and Access Management (IAM) infrastructure. The legacy architecture created operational bottlenecks and security risks across multiple domains. This technical case study outlines how the IAM stack was rebuilt to ensure secure, scalable, and resilient collaboration.

The Challenge: A Fragmented and Latency-Prone Identity Ecosystem

The IAM infrastructure presented deep technical debt:

• Over 100 Active Directory forests with brittle trust relationships
• Legacy Oracle Identity Manager (OIM 11.1.2.3)
• SOAP-based provisioning with brittle custom code
• 50,000+ roles in a homegrown role management system
• Fragmented SSO landscape

Consequences included:

• Identity duplication and sprawl
• 30+ second delays in role evaluation during login
• Provisioning lag times exceeding 48 hours
• Gaps in auditability for access reviews
• VDI performance degradation over constrained links

Technical Solution Architecture

Phase 1: Unified Identity Graph

A metadata-driven identity fabric was introduced using Apache Atlas. Kafka-based real-time streams populated a GraphQL identity resolution layer to reconcile identity variants across disparate systems:

{
  "eventType": "IDENTITY_RESOLUTION",
  "timestamp": "2024-01-05T10:30:00Z",
  "identityMatches": [
    {
      "source": "ActiveDirectory",
      "sourceId": "jsmith",
      "confidence": 0.95,
      "matchedAttributes": ["email", "employeeId", "department"]
    }
  ]
}

Phase 2: Latency-Tuned Role Evaluation

Role-based access control (RBAC) was rebuilt around Redis, achieving 100ms p99 performance via pre-evaluated cache lookups and dynamic role overlays:

def evaluate_dynamic_role(user_attributes, context):
    base_roles = get_base_roles(user_attributes['department'])
    risk_score = calculate_risk_score(user_attributes, context)
    
    if risk_score > THRESHOLD:
        return apply_restrictions(base_roles)
    
    return enhance_roles(base_roles, user_attributes['clearance'])

Phase 3: Declarative Role-as-Code

Roles were defined as GitOps-managed YAML, enabling traceability, peer review, and continuous integration:

role:
  name: trading_desk_analyst
  description: "Access for trading desk analysts"
  attributes:
    department: ["trading", "risk"]
    clearance: "level2"
  permissions:
    - system: "trading_platform"
      actions: ["read", "execute_trade"]
    - system: "risk_analytics"
      actions: ["read", "run_analysis"]
  restrictions:
    trading_limit: 1000000
    requires_approval: true

Implementation Highlights

Identity Resolution Accuracy

Resolution pipelines used:

• Jaro-Winkler similarity for fuzzy matching
• ML-assisted contextual inference (department, geography)
• Historical behavior patterning
• Confidence-weighted decision trees

System Performance Gains

Metric	Before	After
Role Evaluation Latency	30 sec	100 ms (p99)
Provisioning Time	48 hours	15 minutes
Audit Cycle Duration	90 days	5 days
Availability (SLA)	97.5%	99.99%

Operational and Business Outcomes

• IAM now scales to 100,000+ users and 5,000+ systems
• Handles 1M+ access requests per day
• Reduced access-related incidents by 75%
• $2.5M saved annually in operational overhead
• Access-related support tickets down 90%
• Compliance audit scores reached 100%
• User satisfaction jumped from 65% to 92%

Technology Stack Overview

Component	Tools Used
Metadata Mgmt	Apache Atlas
Event Streams	Kafka
Role Cache	Redis Enterprise
Infra-as-Code	Terraform, Ansible
CI/CD	GitLab CI, YAML pipelines
Dev Runtime	Kubernetes, Go, Python
Monitoring	Prometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry, ELK

Lessons Learned

1. Probabilistic Identity Resolution

   • Requires clean training data and careful threshold tuning
   • Retraining is critical to adapt to org churn

2. Role Evaluation and Caching

   • Cache invalidation and hierarchy depth must be tightly controlled
   • Dynamic access attributes must be strictly typed and versioned

3. Legacy Interop Risks

   • SOAP-based endpoints introduced fragility
   • Custom connectors required sandboxed regression tests

Forward Path

With the foundation in place, the IAM roadmap includes:

• ML-based anomaly detection on access patterns
• Real-time access decisioning via policy graphs
• Zero-trust enforcement across all domains
• Predictive provisioning based on org chart changes

---

This technical study showcases how fragmented IAM systems in high-stakes environments can be re-architected into scalable, intelligent, and secure platforms that serve both mission and business needs.